Wednesday, January 31, 2024

Feb 2: Quantum Mechanics and Faith?

 At a recent dinner party with friends, the topic of quantum mechanics came up.  Yes, I know, it takes a special group of people to wonder aloud to each other at dinner about quantum entanglement, light's particle/wave duality, the uncertainty principle and such, but that's how we roll around here.  The context of the discussion was how the phenomena of quantum mechanics were so at odds with our understanding and experiences with the macro world we live in.  And hidden in the background was a feeling that there might be the basis for a religious or semi-religious philosophy here somewhere.  (According to QM theory a thing doesn't exist until we look for it, right?)  

There has been a lot of conjecture that QM has a role to play with consciousness, and many have tried to connect the dots in that way.  I have a book on my shelf called The Physics of Consciousness, by Evan Harris Walker that spells out just such a theory, and has been the basis for a topic for BQ many years ago.  There seems to be something special about QM that lends itself to extrapolation to metaphysical realms in some way, so why not talk about them?

So I asked Bard, the AI:  Is there an element of the supernatural in quantum mechanics?  Could quantum mechanics be the basis of a faith system?

<Bard's Response> 

Whether there's an element of the supernatural in quantum mechanics is a complex question with no easy answer. It depends heavily on your definition of "supernatural."

Here's why it's a tricky topic:

  • Quantum mechanics is undeniably strange: It deals with concepts like superposition, entanglement, and wave-particle duality, which seem counter-intuitive and defy everyday experience. This strangeness can lead some to associate it with the supernatural, even though it's firmly grounded in scientific principles and tested through experiments.
  • Science and religion often explore different realms: Science focuses on the natural world and explanations based on evidence and observation, while religion deals with the spiritual realm and questions of ultimate meaning and purpose. They can overlap in some areas, but their approaches differ fundamentally.
  • Interpretations of quantum mechanics vary: There are different interpretations of quantum mechanics, each with its own implications. Some interpretations, like the Copenhagen interpretation, emphasize the probabilistic nature of quantum events, which can be misinterpreted as "randomness" and fuel supernatural ideas. Others, like the Many Worlds interpretation, suggest the existence of parallel universes, which can also sound fantastical.

Can it be the basis of a faith system?

While quantum mechanics offers fascinating insights into the universe, it's not generally considered a suitable basis for a faith system itself. Here's why:

  • Lack of moral guidance: Quantum mechanics primarily deals with the physical world and doesn't offer answers to questions about morality, ethics, or the meaning of life. These are typically addressed by religious or philosophical systems.
  • Absence of deities or spirituality: Quantum mechanics doesn't introduce deities, supernatural forces, or spiritual practices, which are often core components of faith systems.
  • Focus on evidence and reason: Science, including quantum mechanics, relies on evidence and reason, while faith systems often involve belief and personal interpretation.

However, some people find inspiration in the beauty and mystery of quantum mechanics and use it to strengthen their existing faith or develop their own personal spiritual beliefs. This can involve drawing parallels between quantum phenomena and religious concepts, or simply finding comfort in the vastness and complexity of the universe revealed by science.

Ultimately, whether you see a supernatural element in quantum mechanics or not is a personal decision based on your individual beliefs and understanding. It's important to approach the topic with an open mind and be aware of the different perspectives involved. <end>

1 comment: