Monday, February 22, 2016

Mentoring is All Around Us


From our earliest age we have been taught by our parents, family, and others older and wiser than we.  Teaching comes naturally to parents, and children absorb it all.  They take in the technical content like language, behavior, socialization, and cultural norms with Mother’s Milk, and we grow up “just knowing” so many things we learn at this very young age.  And how I am enjoying the process from the perspective of being a grandparent with the little ones around all the time. 

Something happens in our adolescent years, however.  Somewhere in that morass of hormones and intellectual development their creeps in a sense of self, an awareness of Life As A Journey and our place within that journey.  And the idea that decisions made today may and probably will have consequences for a lifetime. 

The “What do you want to be when you grow up?” Question takes on added significance.  How do we know what we want to be?  How do we know whom we want to be?  What does it mean to be a Something, a named stereotypic category of a person that may liberate or stigmatize us the rest of our lives?  Will that Something fit with our self-perception and personal expectations?  Will picking that Something make me happy?  Questions like this make Teens a bit anxious, even a bit crazy.

The Existentialists have a phrase that I like in this context: Become Who You Are.  Combining the ideas of Becoming as the imperfect physical world and Being as the perfection of Plato’s Forms, it speaks to the idea that, at our core, we are each someone with unique qualities of Soul, of an essential and personal Self.  Perhaps this is the Personal Truth that underlies our search for the divine.   A life spent in awareness of the world of Becoming is a life spent seeking the perfection of Being.

The “What do you want to be” question seems to be asking, “Who will you become”, or more fundamentally,  “Who are you, really?”  Asking a person who is still figuring things out about just who they are in their core, to make a decision about a life direction is quite unfair.  People spend a lifetime trying to answer that one!  Many people here in this room right now might count themselves among those who are still seeking to know who they are at their core!

We look to our parents as the first Role Models after whom we can fashion our lives, if the situation is right.  Nature vs. Nurture comes into play here, of course, and there is certainly a strong pull of genetics in any decision we may make, but our Mother’s and Father’s personalities, sense of themselves, and lifestyles complete with challenges and successes will have a strong and profound effect.  It can be positive, and it can be negative.  Who hasn’t said, even if privately to themselves, “I’m never going to do what my Father did.” Or something similar?  Still, there is no denying the genetics of family, and the powerful effects they have on our lives.

But let’s consider the idea of Role Models.  Language, speech, dress, daily life, etiquette, empathy, compassion, responsibility, boundaries both personal and social, and a host of other explicit and implied behavioral characteristics are learned by example, by watching others and mimicking them as Role Models.  It can’t be helped, and it is a part of all of us.  This can be what we call Normative Behavior, or seeking the Norm.  You might also think of this as being our process of Fitting In, and it may comprise some large percentage of our concepts of Self.  Maybe not so much the unique parts, but the basic, how do I get along with others parts.

Aside:  I recently read about studies made of the way people interact in social settings.  The studies were by university sociologists who were trying to understand why we do some of the odd things we do.  Have you ever noticed that people who stand around talking will tend to all stand the same way?  If one crosses their arms, others will, too.  Or put your hands in your pockets?   If you happen to think of this while you are standing around during coffee today, try it. It works!  You can get others to follow your example. 

Another example cited in the report was the tendency for a parent to open their own mouths when feeding a baby.  The baby opens its mouth to receive the spoon of creamed carrots, and then the parent closes their mouth to encourage the baby to do the same thing, and it works.  This is the same mental process in another context.  (Now you don’t have to feel embarrassed when it happens to you!)

Well, the researchers were looking at brain activity and found something they called Mirror Neurons in the brain that are the unconscious source of this parroting activity.  You mirror others without thinking about what you are doing.  It is an innate, universal characteristic of the human brain.  What does that say about our evolutionary development, or about Crowd Think?

Are Role Models Mentors?  Not necessarily, if you consider the perspective of the mentee.  A mentor is a valued and trusted advisor, not necessarily a teacher or role model, but someone who specifically looks out for the mentee and to whom the mentee turns for help and support, especially in the realm of Life Coach sorts of areas.  It is this intentional sense of participation in the advising role by both that makes the Mentor-Mentee relationship special. 

As adults we may find ourselves assigned as a Mentor or Mentee by our organization as a way to help a younger person advance through the company structure more effectively. 

In the recent movie The Intern, an older retired executive is brought into a Dot.Com company where the average age of the workforce might be in their 20’s.  These bright and motivated younger adults find the perspectives and experiences of the older Intern to be life changing, and very helpful in issues ranging from finding an apartment to finding love. While the movie is clearly a nod to the wisdom of older people, which of course I applaud, it was also a great look at a nurturing Mentor-Mentee relationship in action.

In adolescence a person’s circle of friends has a huge impact on our self-esteem, our sense of place, and to some degree, the trajectory we expect our life to take.  What you expect of yourself is, to a large degree, informed by the Group Think expectation of the social structure around you.  Motivated and ambitious people motivate the people around them.  Negative and disruptive people affect people around them adversely.  We pick our groups perhaps subconsciously, but perhaps intentionally.  With whom are you most comfortable?

Kids negotiating High School pick friends of similar interests in education and school activities.  Cliques of high achievers occur.  Others are more interested in specific activities like athletics, or band, or debate, or skipping class and driving cars.  We can all remember the day, right?  Which group were you a part of?  And perhaps of more lasting importance, did your choice of friends then affect how you have lived your life since?

In my day there was something called Tracking, where, on the basis of a student’s performance on tests, their GPA, and their teacher’s general impression of the potential of the student, kids were tracked into “College Bound” or, for boys, what might be called “Vocational” areas.  For girls the alternative might have been called Home Ec, or some variant.  – Not very politically correct these days, right? -  Once the track was set, then a defined school curriculum was expected of the student, with little room for variation.  I hope the track chosen for you was the one you felt was right for you.  It was hard to change, and it set in place a set of expectations for you, and it told others around you something about who you were. 

But my point here is aptitude and attitude.  This is a difficult time for many kids at ages 14 to 18 or so, and knowing what you want for yourself at that stage is really challenging, but we all had a sense of ability, and where we fit in the overall Big Picture.  Like lining up from tallest to shortest, we had a sense where we would end up in line if we used smartest to dumbest as the criterion, or maybe fastest to slowest on the cross country track.  Everything was a competition, a 1-on-1 comparison, and ranking.  This helped us know where we stood, informed our self-expectation, and helped us set our personal bar.

Layered on top of this is what I will call Raging Hormones.  I don’t think I need to say much about this, other than hormones come in their own sweet time, and can be a blessing or a curse.  It is all a matter of your perspective, and how you handle it.

My favorite metaphor for kids in this age is that they are in the Pupae Stage.  You can see it through dress, the way they wear their hair, language, interaction with peers and parents, interests, and angst.  On the other side of the growing up process lays Adulthood, responsibility, commitment to some sort of Path or other, and Getting on the Treadmill of life.  For the young adults at this cross-road of life this Adult Stuff is all in the future, a bit out of sight, and something not to be welcomed, but rather to be delayed as long as possible.  At least for most.

So let’s get back to the idea of a Mentor, and how this might all fit together.  Accepting that some sort of life path will require at least a minimal commitment to an activity that will allow a person to live, such as to make money and have a cool cell phone, how is a person to choose

Adults with some sense of the journey of life have learned that the best thing we can choose to do is something that we love.  Follow your passion.  While this might be easy to say, it can be bewildering.  What if the thing you love isn’t something you know how to make money doing?  How is that supposed to work?  This is where a Mentor can help out.  Mentors know things.  Mentors have that Long View of Life where they can help advise you on how best to take your talents to the market and make something positive out of them.  And often what they suggest is not something you might have thought of yourself.

One of the most non-intuitive things a Mentor might tell you is, You will make exactly as much money in life as you expect to make.  Since making money is at the root of a great deal of the angst we all feel about our place in life, this statement might sound a bit crazy.  What if I want to make a bazillion dollars?  You mean I can do that?  Yes, a Mentor will tell you, but you must dedicate yourself to the task, chart a path to your destination, work diligently at the task without hesitation, and follow that path without fail.  Forget anything else. 

I like the story about the guy who used Craig’s List and started with almost nothing - a paper clip – and by trading and negotiating over a period of months ended up with a house worth many thousands of dollars.  You can take a very meager beginning and make it into anything you want.  You just need to want it bad enough to give up everything else to get it.  – Sounds like the American Dream, doesn’t it?

Most of us have an Aristotelian Golden Mean sort of goal for money in our lives.  This means we desire a certain amount of money where we have enough to do what we need to do without working all the time to earn it.    But if you want it all, that path is open.  There are plenty of examples in modern culture: Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerburg, Jeff Bezos.

The complimentary view is the Work or Play paradox.  Do you work to live, or live to work?  I think the answer to that conundrum changes depending on the stage you are in life.  Certainly sacrifices for work are more common for younger workers trying to find their place or to make their mark, and less common for established workers who don’t need the aggravation or upset a sacrifice might entail.

Life is a journey, not a destination.  We all live day to day.  We make plans for the future and certainly save for that eventual rainy day, but we have to make ends meet today, too.  Keeping that sense of balance takes years of trial and error for all of us.  Mentoring can help guide expectations, keep steps from being missed, and make the process of selection much more assured.

And remember, no battle plan survives the first contact with the enemy.  We all have to be flexible and roll with life’s punches.  Mentoring can really help when things seem to be falling apart!

In the context of the Fellowship we see informal mentoring occurring as we support one another in our independent searches for Truth and Meaning.  Our spiritual paths are an innate part of who we are, and our need to search for our personal place in the grand scheme of life.  A minister acts as a teacher and role model for most, and can become a personal mentor for people who seek out that more personal, specific relationship.  

Informal and formal mentorship may also occur in the special groups we participate in here, like the Men’s and Women’s Groups, Circle Suppers, Big Questions and Food for Thought.  There are many ways in which we can meet and interact with each other in ways that are more than just conversations, but also avenues to personal growth and development.    What would happen if you asked someone you trusted and respected to help you with an issue that concerns you?  Would the act of asking for help put you in a Mentor-Mentee relationship?

We live in this intentional community in part to associate with others that share our values and aspirations, our perspectives on life, and what it means to be spiritual.  But I think in another sense we seek associations with people to whom we can look up and admire, to learn from, and who may be able to learn something from each of us.  We all have our gifts that we can share, and when we share them with people in our community we add our presence and a quality of life that enriches us all. 


Namaste 

Thursday, October 30, 2014

BQ Moves Into a New Phase

Big Questions is taking a break in 2015.

It has morphed into something a little different, but something I think you may be interested in following.  I will not be using this site for this new venture, but have created a new one.  On this new site I will update the content monthly, or more often, and include reference materials, links to sites you may want to read, and generally manage the process of keeping the flame burning, so to speak.

The new site is UU Perspectives on Faith.

Check it out.

Saturday, September 13, 2014

Just checking

My blog gives me statistics that show how many people have visited the site, read the different posts, and so forth.  My last posting has no comments, and a few views.  I guess this supports my decision to suspend the meetings.  Not a whimper, not a complaint.

We all have moved on.

Monday, September 8, 2014

Big Questions is Off Line

To my many loyal BQ followers over the past many years, I wanted to send a personal message.  I have decided to suspend Big Questions for at least this fall, and "give it a rest".  I feel a bit of burn out, having done many of the question many times.  Let's let it percolate for a while and see if we feel like picking it up again.

As you drive or sit and think about life, think, "What would Socrates have thought about this?"

Dialectically.

Desmond

Thursday, April 17, 2014

Water and People - Conflict?

Last week I drove through central and southern California, both in a rental car and on my bicycle.  This included a car tour of the San Joaquin valley, especially the parts used for agriculture.  I saw vast fields of crops growing, with citrus, nuts, vegetables, and plants of all sorts.  Most were irrigated using a drip system where the water a plant receives comes to it through a plastic pipe, which prevents annoying things like evaporation and soil seepage from stealing from the water supply.

I recently read the book Cadillac Desert, which includes a large section concerning the acquisition of several watersheds for the use of the residents of the Los Angeles valley.  The politicos of LA were able to co-opt the waters of places like Owens Valley, among others, forcing the residents of these relatively less inhabited areas to abandon their claims for lack of the water needed to make a living, in order to serve the greater good of the "Many" in the valley lower down the watershed.  The Colorado River, the Salton Sea, and the Ogalla Aquifer are all part of the story here.

Today the water shortage makes the news, and most certainly exists in a sort of abstract sense.  Driving around I didn't see it.  Green lawns, golf courses, trees and plants outside, and no lack of proper amenities in homes and businesses dependent on water.  To be sure the weather is hot and dry, and bicycling, I suffered terribly for the lack of water, at points.  Sweating, breathing dry air that we do not have at any time of the year here in Snohomish, and heat that drew my "precious bodily fluids" out of my body and onto the road beneath me in the form of sweat and spit, I felt myself dehydrating.

So, my point is that we, as a culture, have agreed to sustain a population of people in a place where, without the extreme measures we take to provide water, would not support life as we know it.  Is this a good thing?  OK, the weather is great with respect to the things we all like, such as temperature, humidity, seasonality, and all that, but at what cost to the environment, and to the rest of us?   If we divert water to the millions of people in southern CA that would have otherwise severed other purposes, what price will we pay in the long term?  Can the calculus of utilitarianism be applied here?  The best and highest good for the greatest number?  I'm not so sure.

Is this a Big Question?  Or is this a Question that just happened to hit me in the face?  You decide.


Thursday, March 20, 2014

Cultural Relativism

With the topic of cultural relativism available both from the last posting about Speaker of the Dead, and with what we are daily exposed to with respect to world cultures, I think this remains a viable topic.  One of my regulars has mentioned to me their interest in the writings of Peter Hessler and his work on the culture of China.  Perhaps we can tread that path, as well.

See you on Friday.

Friday, December 20, 2013

Cultural conflict?

I've just finished reading Orson Scott Card's "Speaker for the Dead".  This is the second book in the Ender Wiggins series.  In the first book, "Ender's Game", Ender is tricked into using is exceptional skills to direct the military forces of the humans to destroy the home planet of the Buggers, an insect-like race of sentient beings.  It turns out that the Buggers were really only trying to get by, and the conflict that put them up against the humans was a cost of cross-cultural misunderstanding.

In this second book Ender is engaged in a second encounter, this time with a race of beings very different from humans, but also less threatening.  The book is well written and has plenty of plot twists and interesting characters to keep your interest, but at the root of it is another example of human society coming into conflict with an "other" that they don't understand.  These are a forest-dwelling group of furry creatures with dramatic sexual dimorphism and a completely different sort of life cycle.  The central government of the new human race has strict limits on the sorts of contact the humans can have with these new creatures (who speak several languages, including the human ones), so that there is very limited understanding at the point where Ender shows up and engages them fully (he's a special guy).  In short order he fathoms the Piggies (as they are called by the humans), meets with the different groups, comes to understand the life cycle issues, and forms a style and level of communication with them that is between equals (which takes some doing, as the Piggies are actually superior to humans in many ways).  In summary, Ender saves the day.  I want him on my Team!

My point of all this is that here is another example of the fascination people have with the idea of the Otherness of cultures that are different than ours.  There are things that happen with the Piggies that are deeply disturbing to the people, but only because they don't understand what is going on.  In some senses it is very much like the cases I wrote about earlier.

Has anybody read this book?  Are you ready to try out cultural relativism again?