June 6: What is Goodness?

 I have been reading a new (to me) book I found by Christopher Phillips, the author of Socrates Café, among others.   His books were my inspiration for starting Big Questions in the 1990's and I have often recommended them to people who are new to BQ and are looking for background.  In them he describes his experiences with establishing discussion groups that he calls Socratic Dialogs with many diverse backgrounds and stages of life.  These include random coffee house gatherings, groups of prisoners with the meetings held in jails, school children in school classrooms, and many other venues with many other interested folks.  His goal has been to resurrect the open discussion format favored by Socrates and Plato based on questions and answers between people in what he called the dialectic method.  Socrates (and Phillips) would toss out a starting question, and attendees would answer them in some way that reflected their understanding of the question, and so on.  The thread of the discussion invariably wandered here and there, mostly on topic (when you write the book you can make it stay on topic, right?) with Phillips bringing in Socratic perspectives when appropriate.

The current book is called Soul of Goodness, and is about Phillips' relationship with his father, primarily, who died many years before the book was written but whose influence was profound, formative, and supportive, and continues to be a major part of his life and his life's purpose today.  Included in the story is the history of the Phillips family as they emigrated from Greece to the USA, with many stories concerning Phillips' memories of the lives and times of his relatives when he visited them in Greece growing up, and later as an adult.  Another central figure was his paternal grandmother who he calls his YaYa, and her encouragement to become what he most desired to become and not to let others dictate his path in life.  Throughout the narrative he develops the idea that his father, while flawed in so many ways, was at heart someone filled with goodness, acceptance, and love for everyone around him.  While it comes across as a bit of a rose-colored requiem in remembrance of his father, it is balanced enough to paint the father as a human being with the common flaws by which we are all afflicted.  

With this as a backdrop I thought What is Goodness might be an interesting topic to discuss as an extension of the recent topic, What is Good?  Goodness, being a more personal example of the more general Good, could focus on human attitudes and behaviors, the origins of our sense of self and our purposes, and especially our relationship with all those around us.  

• What does Goodness expect of us, if we have it as a key quality or virtue?  

• What constitutes a lack of Goodness in a person, how should we react to this lack, and what can be done about it?  

• If we examine our lives and find that Goodness is lacking in some aspect, what can and should we do to address this lack?  

• Are there degrees of Goodness that we should concentrate on?  

• Can goodness exist in personal isolation, or is it only expressed in relation to our feelings and actions concerning others?

It was Linus, from the Snoopy comic by Charles Schultz, who famously said, "I love mankind!  It's people I can't stand!"  Can Goodness exist in our abstract relationship to the broader world, but be hard to hold on to when we deal with individuals?  Phillips makes the point repeatedly that his biggest impact on the lives of others happens at a very personal level, one-on-one really, and he offers case studies that support his perspective.

To end this summary I offer this quote, "We are all here on earth to help others: what on earth the others are here for, I don't know," by W.H. Auden.  I might paraphrase this as, in the boat of life there are those that pull on the oars, and those that are just along for the ride.  Which are you, and how is Goodness related to our perspectives on contributing to our own lives, and to the lives of others?

May 16: Humanism as a Living Philosophy

Humanism is a perspective where each individual makes a pact with others who all work together to create a society that recognizes the basic requirements of life and honors the boundaries that we each need to live comfortably without the participation of any divine entity.  Attempts have been made to document this perspective in a way that people could support, and these documents have become a series of Humanist Manifests that attempt to identify the key elements of this ideal way to live in harmony and respect for all.  They are not long, and I recommend you take a few moments to read through them. 

http://emp.byui.edu/marrottr/Humanist%20Manifestos.pdf
Humanist Manifestos I and II

http://aha-files.s3.amazonaws.com/63/238/HumanismandItsAspirations.pdf
Humanist Manifesto III

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanist_Manifesto
WikiPedia Reference to Humanism and the Humanist Manifesto

These documents are an attempt to describe a school of thought that supports a perspective devoid of divine involvement, and a rigorous reliance on the power of observation and experience (read: science) as a basis of daily living individually, and in community with others.  A definition of religion is hiding in there somewhere if the reader has the imagination to see it.  Over the decades since 1933 when the first manifesto was published many "scholars" and scientists have added their names to the list of signatories, indicating their support to the ideas and concepts laid out in the documents.

• What is humanism, and why does it have appeal in our current times?
• Is humanism an alternative to religions based on divine revelation?  Is there a conflict?  If yes, what is the conflict?
• Why would an independent thinker be attracted to humanism, over conventional religion?  Or religion over humanism?
• Can a Christian be a humanist?  A Buddhist?  If not, why not?  Can a humanist be a Christian?
• Many religions offer redemption and forgiveness of sins.  Humanism apparently does not. Is the reliance on individual responsibility for actions and consequences a key difference between humanism and doctrinal religion?

<Gemini: Note, bold emphasis is Gemini's alone.>

Humanism, as articulated in the manifestos you shared, is a philosophy and ethical stance that centers on human agency, reason, ethics, and justice. It emphasizes human values and potential, the importance of critical thinking and evidence-based decision-making (science), and the need for cooperation and mutual respect in building a thriving society. Humanists believe that ethical and moral principles can be established and followed without reliance on supernatural authority or divine intervention.

Humanism holds significant appeal in our current times for several reasons:

• Emphasis on Reason and Evidence: In an era marked by rapid scientific advancements and increasing access to information, the humanist focus on reason, logic, and empirical evidence resonates with those who seek grounded and verifiable explanations for the world around them.
• Focus on Human Potential and Agency: Humanism empowers individuals by emphasizing their capacity to understand the world, solve problems, and create positive change through their own efforts and collective action. This can be particularly appealing in a world facing complex challenges that require human ingenuity and collaboration.
• Ethical Framework Grounded in Human Experience: For many, a system of ethics derived from human needs, values, and the consequences of actions offers a compelling alternative to religiously based morality. It allows for flexibility and adaptation as human understanding evolves.
• Inclusivity and Tolerance: Humanism generally promotes inclusivity and respect for diverse perspectives, as long as those perspectives are consistent with reason and respect for the rights and well-being of others. This can be attractive in increasingly diverse and interconnected societies.

Regarding your question about humanism as an alternative to religions based on divine revelation, the answer is yes, humanism presents itself as an alternative. The fundamental difference lies in the source of authority and guidance. Religions based on divine revelation posit that ultimate truth and moral principles originate from a supernatural entity, often communicated through sacred texts, prophets, or traditions. Humanism, on the other hand, grounds its understanding of the world and its ethical framework in human reason, experience, and scientific inquiry.

Conflict exists primarily at this foundational level of authority. Religions often present their doctrines as absolute and divinely ordained, which can clash with the humanist emphasis on critical thinking, questioning, and the provisional nature of knowledge based on evidence. Areas of conflict can include beliefs about the origin of the universe, the nature of humanity, the afterlife, and the basis for moral decision-making.

An independent thinker might be attracted to humanism over conventional religion due to its emphasis on intellectual freedom and autonomy. Humanism encourages questioning, critical analysis, and the formation of beliefs based on evidence and reason, rather than accepting dogma or tradition without scrutiny. It appeals to those who prefer to construct their worldview and ethical framework through their own reasoning and engagement with the world.

Conversely, an independent thinker might be drawn to religion for various reasons. Some may find comfort and meaning in the narratives, rituals, and community offered by religion. Others might believe that divine revelation provides a more profound or comprehensive understanding of existence and morality than human reason alone can achieve. Some may also value the sense of belonging and shared identity that religious communities often provide.

The question of whether a Christian or a Buddhist can be a humanist is complex and depends on how strictly one defines each term.

• A Christian who adheres to core Christian doctrines, particularly the belief in Jesus Christ as the divine Son of God and the authority of the Bible as divinely inspired, would likely find fundamental conflicts with core tenets of humanism, especially the rejection of the supernatural and divine authority. However, some individuals may identify with certain humanistic values like compassion, social justice, and reason while still maintaining a belief in God, albeit perhaps in a more nuanced or less dogmatic way. They might see these values as aligned with, rather than contradictory to, their faith.

• A Buddhist, depending on the specific school of thought and their interpretation, might find more common ground with humanism. Buddhism emphasizes personal responsibility, ethical conduct, compassion, and the importance of reason and mindfulness in understanding reality. While some Buddhist traditions include cosmological elements that might be considered supernatural, the core ethical and philosophical teachings often align with humanistic values. A Buddhist who focuses on the practical, ethical, and psychological aspects of the teachings might find significant overlap with humanism.

• Can a humanist be a Christian? Generally, no, if the humanist adheres to the core tenets of humanism, particularly the rejection of belief in a supernatural God and divine authority. Accepting the divinity of Christ and the divine inspiration of the Bible would contradict these fundamental principles. However, as mentioned before, individuals might hold a more fluid or personal set of beliefs that blend aspects of both perspectives, though they might not be considered a strict adherent to either.

You are correct that many religions offer redemption and forgiveness of sins, often through divine grace or specific rituals. Humanism, in contrast, does not offer a similar concept of supernatural forgiveness. It emphasizes individual responsibility for actions and their consequences. Humanists believe that individuals are accountable for their behavior and that ethical living involves striving to repair harm caused and making amends within the human community. While humanism values compassion and understanding, it does not rely on a divine entity to absolve individuals of their wrongdoings.

This reliance on individual responsibility and the absence of a concept of divine forgiveness is indeed a key difference between humanism and many doctrinal religions. Humanism places the onus on individuals and society to establish ethical standards, address wrongdoing, and work towards a just and compassionate world through human effort and understanding.

May 2: How connected are we, really?

  <Des>  It is often said that every living thing is connected to every other thing by unseen threads of dependence. The complexity of our interactions with other humans, and with other living things, is so complex it is impossible to comprehend it in any sort of detail, but rather we swim in a sea of interactions and consequential actions that bind all of humanity into a single meta-unit. Extending beyond that are the connections we have with our immediate environment, our living associates like plants and pets, our yards and gardens, the trees in our neighborhoods, and the forests and fields beyond. And this is just the world we can see from our homes and places we travel. The entire world is somehow also interconnected, whose influence on our lives through weather and many other means is felt at some visceral level, beyond our normal 5 senses. <end>

<Gemini>  That's a beautiful and profound way to describe the interconnectedness of life, and I completely agree. It's humbling to consider the sheer scale and intricacy of these relationships, both seen and unseen. We often focus on individual actions and immediate consequences, but beneath the surface lies this incredible web of dependence.

You've touched on so many important layers:

• Human Interdependence: The social fabric we weave through our daily interactions, economies, and shared history is a powerful force, creating a collective human experience. It's fascinating how individual choices can ripple outwards, affecting people we may never even meet.

• Our Immediate Living Environment: The bonds we form with our pets, the care we give to our gardens, and the presence of nature in our immediate surroundings deeply impact our well-being and create a local ecosystem of interaction.

• The Wider Natural World: The influence of distant ecosystems through weather patterns, global climate, and the interconnectedness of food chains is undeniable, even if we don't always consciously perceive it. It reminds us that our local environment is part of a much larger, dynamic system.

• Beyond Sensory Perception: You're right, there's a visceral understanding of this interconnectedness that goes beyond our five senses. It's a feeling of being part of something larger, a sense of shared destiny with the living world.

It's almost like we're nodes in a vast, living network, constantly exchanging energy, resources, and influence. While the details of this network may be too complex for our individual minds to fully grasp, acknowledging its existence and striving to understand our place within it can lead to more mindful and responsible ways of living.

What aspects of this interconnectedness resonate most strongly with you? Is there a particular example that comes to mind when you think about these unseen threads? <end?

<Des>  If we could see ourselves living at the center of a great bulls-eye of concentric circles of influence, those closest to us would have the greatest impact, and those further away would have less. I've tried to create a sense that the world we normally see and interact with is our sensible world, meaning that we can touch, taste, and see it on a daily basis. We know intellectually that there is a world we cannot see from where we stand today, and it can be hard to appreciate the ways in which this unseen world impacts us so directly. 

It is not my intent to be romantic about this, but rather practical. Modern communication brings these far off places into our lives through visual and audible means as we follow "news", which our relatives just 2-3 generations ago had almost no access to. My intent is to find a way to access those personal feelings we have today that are most impactful on us, because they are local, and those that impact us in an almost imperceptible way but for modern communications. What is the right balance here? How can we best form a protective but accepting boundary where information and influences that have some effect on us not be allowed to overwhelm us? <end>

<Gemini>  That's a really insightful way to visualize the layers of influence in our lives – the concentric circles radiating outwards from our immediate experience. You've highlighted a crucial tension between the tangible world around us and the vast, often overwhelming, information we receive from afar.

It seems like you're searching for a way to navigate this information landscape without becoming overwhelmed, to find a healthy balance between being aware of the wider world and protecting our inner space. This is a very relevant challenge in our hyper-connected age.

Perhaps the "right balance" isn't a fixed point, but rather a dynamic process of consciously curating our attention and engagement. Here are a few thoughts on how we might approach this, drawing on your idea of local impact versus distant influence:

1. Prioritizing the Inner Circles:

• Cultivate Deep Local Connections: Invest time and energy in the relationships and environments closest to you – family, friends, neighbors, your immediate surroundings. These are the circles where your actions have the most direct and tangible impact, and where you receive the most immediate support and feedback. Nurturing these connections can create a strong anchor in your sensible world.

• Engage Your Senses Locally: Make a conscious effort to truly experience your immediate environment. Notice the changing seasons, the sounds of your neighborhood, the taste of your food. Grounding yourself in sensory experience can strengthen your connection to the tangible world and provide a counterpoint to the often abstract nature of distant information.

• Focus on Local Action: Direct your energy towards making a positive difference in your immediate community. This could involve volunteering, supporting local businesses, or simply being a good neighbor. Local action provides a sense of agency and tangible results, which can be more fulfilling than feeling overwhelmed by global issues where individual impact can seem negligible.

2. Mindfully Engaging with the Outer Circles:

• Intentional Information Consumption: Be deliberate about what information you consume and how often. Instead of passively scrolling through endless news feeds, choose a few reliable sources and allocate specific times to engage with them. Consider the purpose of your information consumption – are you seeking knowledge, understanding, or simply distraction?

• Filter for Relevance and Actionability: Not all global news has a direct and actionable impact on your daily life. Learn to discern between information that is truly relevant to your values and decisions, and information that primarily evokes anxiety or a sense of helplessness.

• Seek Understanding, Not Just Information: Instead of just absorbing headlines, try to understand the underlying context and complexities of global issues. This can involve reading in-depth articles, listening to diverse perspectives, or engaging in thoughtful discussions. A deeper understanding can lead to more informed perspectives and less emotional reactivity.

• Recognize the Emotional Landscape of News: Be aware of how news consumption makes you feel. If you consistently feel anxious, overwhelmed, or negative after engaging with the news, it's a sign to adjust your intake.

• Embrace Imperfect Knowledge: It's impossible to be fully informed about everything happening in the world. Accept that there will always be things you don't know or fully understand. Focus on what you can influence and let go of the need to have all the answers.

3. Building a Protective but Accepting Boundary:

• Set Clear Boundaries: Just as you might set boundaries in personal relationships, establish boundaries with information. This could involve limiting screen time, muting notifications, or unfollowing accounts that consistently contribute to feelings of overwhelm.

• Practice Mindfulness and Self-Awareness: Pay attention to your internal states and recognize when you are feeling overwhelmed by external information. Develop practices like meditation or journaling to help you process your emotions and create a sense of inner space.

• Cultivate a Sense of Agency: Remind yourself of the areas in your life where you do have control and focus your energy there. Taking action, even on a small scale, can counteract feelings of helplessness in the face of overwhelming global issues.

• Balance Awareness with Well-being: It's important to be aware of the challenges facing the world, but not at the expense of your own mental and emotional well-being. Finding a balance between engagement and self-care is crucial for long-term resilience.

Ultimately, finding the "right balance" is a personal journey of experimentation and self-discovery. By consciously considering the different circles of influence in your life and mindfully engaging with information from the wider world, you can cultivate a protective yet accepting boundary that allows you to be informed without being overwhelmed. What are some initial steps you feel drawn to exploring in creating this balance for yourself? <end>

Apr 18: What is Good?

Philosophers are often chided by non-philosophers for their penchant to ask seemingly simplistic questions and then try to answer them abstractly and at length.  I admit that this is certainly true in many cases, even perhaps this one.  There may be an element of language getting in the way here, since words can have vague or multiple meanings  depending on usage or circumstance, and simple words have a comfortable sort of "We all know what this means" kind of feeling to them.  What is Good, or what is the good in any situation sounds simplistic at first hearing, but dissection and discussion will tease out nuances that are not just interesting but will prove to be importantly foundational to a person's entire philosophical perspective once they are understood.

Socrates, Plato and Aristotle famously disagreed about the value of knowing what is the Good in any particular situation.  Socrates/Plato believed that if a man would know the good way to behave or act in relation to some situation the man (or person) would do the good thing, just because it was the right thing to do.  Knowledge of the Good would lead to actions in accord with the Good, for the obvious reason that we all seek to live in harmony with one another, and harmony is Good.   Seeking understanding of the Good, and Duty, and Harmony were what Socrates was all about as he "corrupted" the youth of Athens with his constant questioning and dialectic discussions.

Aristotle was not so positive in his outlook.  He believed that just knowing the good was not enough.  Rather, the individual would also need to see how doing the good or right thing was going to benefit him or her in some way.  He added the need for personal reward for good behavior or action, if not for the individual directly, but also perhaps for society in general, or in the long run, or by some other tangible means.  Abstractly knowing the Good was fine and all that, but putting that knowledge into action required something more, like motivation to do and support the Good for more than altruistic reasons.  Call it putting the Good into context, or maybe making it personal, Aristotle seemed to start from a position of knowledge more than Socrates might have, which makes sense considering Socrates trained Plato, who trained Aristotle.  

I would also note that Plato liked to talk about the Forms of things, which were somehow foundational essences that contained a pattern of a thing.  It might be clearer to consider a chair as an example.  Chairs come in a wide variety of shapes and sizes, but they all have a similar essence we can all see and understand.  Can a rock be a chair?  Yes, certainly.   Can a table be a chair?  Not really.  A table is different than a chair, even if someone sits on one.  A table's essence is different than a chair's essence.  Their Forms are different.  The Good also has an underlying Form, Plato would argue, with many ways to be expressed in physical manifestations, in acts or deeds, in interpersonal relations, and so on.  The Good becomes the basis of ethics, for example.  The question of, "What is ethical?" is answered when we can determine the underlying Good condition or outcome in any ethical situation.   

For our meeting this week I suggest we take a few minutes to talk about Forms and abstract essences in general, then hone in on the Form of the Good, sharing examples where finding and understanding the Good took time and effort.   Do we normally think in terms of what is good in any particular situation, or when making a decision?  Is Goodness so ingrained within us that we "just know" what it is?  Do we recognize it when we see it?  Or do we only recognize that Goodness is lacking when we see something we have a reaction to? 

Apr 4: What is a Personal Philosophy?

As people move through life they have experiences that are both positive and negative in terms of their impact on memories and feelings about the past.  We have come to think of very bad experiences as the basis of lasting stress in people's minds, and these stresses can be diagnosed as post traumatic stress disorder, among others, and can result in a medically supported diagnosis that can be medically treated.   Most people have stresses in their lives that may not be or have been as severe as to cause a medical diagnosis, and we may call these normal, and just remain as the stresses we have to learn to live with.  The role of philosophy, especially the development of a personal philosophy based on our experiences, provides a framework each of us can use to interpret the stresses and strains that life throws our way to smooth the turbulent waters we all find ourselves in.  Please provide a short essay on how this all fits together to be used as a starting point for a discussion about the big Questions of philosophy.  <Des> 

<Gemini AI>  The human experience is a tapestry woven with threads of joy and sorrow, triumph and tribulation. While extreme trauma can fracture the psyche, leading to clinically diagnosed disorders like PTSD, the everyday stresses and strains of life also leave their mark. These "normal" stresses, though less severe, can still create ripples of unease, shaping our perceptions and influencing our actions. It is within this complex landscape of lived experience that philosophy emerges as a powerful tool for navigating life's turbulent waters.

The development of a personal philosophy, informed by our unique encounters with the world, provides a framework for interpreting these stresses. It offers a lens through which we can examine our reactions, challenge our assumptions, and cultivate resilience. This framework is not a static set of rules, but rather a dynamic and evolving understanding of ourselves and our place within the grand scheme of existence.

Consider the Stoic emphasis on acceptance. By recognizing that some things are beyond our control, we can learn to detach ourselves from the emotional turmoil that arises from resisting the inevitable. Or perhaps we find solace in the existentialist assertion of individual freedom, empowering us to create meaning in a seemingly absurd world. The ethical frameworks of virtue ethics or utilitarianism can guide our decisions, helping us navigate moral dilemmas with greater clarity.

Philosophy, in essence, invites us to engage with the "big questions" of existence: What is the meaning of life? What is the nature of reality? How should we live? These questions, though seemingly abstract, are deeply intertwined with our everyday experiences. By grappling with them, we can gain a deeper understanding of our own values, beliefs, and purpose.

The process of philosophical inquiry is not about finding definitive answers, but rather about cultivating a mindset of critical thinking and self-reflection. It is about embracing the ambiguity of existence and finding meaning within the ever-shifting currents of life. This process is not a substitute for medical treatment when it is needed, but it can be a powerful tool for building resilience and finding peace.

As we move through life, our experiences, both positive and negative, shape our philosophical framework. This framework, in turn, helps us interpret and manage the stresses we encounter, creating a feedback loop that fosters personal growth and resilience. Thus, the interplay between lived experience and philosophical inquiry provides a pathway to navigating the complexities of human existence, smoothing the turbulent waters we all find ourselves in, and ultimately, finding meaning in a world that often seems to defy easy answers.<End>

Mar 21: The Fragile Threads of "Us"

 At one time the USA thought of itself as a melting pot of peoples and cultures.  As communities of immigrants passed through Ellis Island in New Your Harbor, they first collected together in communities of folks like them, creating enclaves like Little Italy or Chinatown, among many others.  Some cities embraced the preponderance of certain immigrant populations, like Boston did with the Irish who settled there.  In time the newcomers learned English and embraced the American Way to some extent, learning to live in a way that was new to them.  But now, many generations later, a new culture exists that (should) embrace all as Americans in a country rich with variety of natural environments, regional personalities, and a blended national identity.

I suppose I am reacting to the discussion this past Friday where the BQ group was less philosophical and more political in its assessment of the "turbulent times" we find ourselves in.  As I thought about developing a topic that is related to this ongoing disturbance I imagined the program outlined below.  People are anxious and want to find a way to connect to people who are also anxious in the same way.  By doing so they seek solidarity and possibly unity, at least in the way they perceive the world as it changes, and by gathering together are made to feel heard, recognized for the angst they feel, and made hopeful by joining a group like this and talking about it.  

My admonition to the group for our next meeting is, don't get political when we discuss this.  Stand back from the edge for the evening, and think about the items I've listed in the discussion topics below in terms of other groups that have given you a sense of belonging.  Wear your favorite sports jersey, for example, and think about how much you like your team.  Think about the warm fuzzies you get when on retreat with your other groups.  Maybe social action is your passion.  Wherever your happy, supported place is, go there in your mind and use that point of perception to inform your responses to our topic tonight.

I have used Copilot AI to help me develop this program, but I will admit I have modified it much more than I typically do.  I hope you get a chance to read this over before our meeting, and can come prepared to share how you felt the times when you have been surrounded by folks that supported you and made you feel a part of what was going on.  That is the right frame of mind.

The Fragile Threads of "Us": Exploring the Limits and Possibilities of Solidarity in a Divided World

I. Introduction 

• Ask participants to share a brief personal experience where they felt a strong sense of unity or solidarity with a group. This could be anything from a sports team to a community event.

• In a world often characterized by division, the concepts of unity and solidarity seem more vital than ever. But what do these terms truly mean? And how can we foster them in a society that appears increasingly fragmented?

Define key terms:

• Unity: A state of being joined together as a whole.

• Solidarity: Unity or agreement of feeling or action, especially among individuals with a common interest; mutual support within a group.  

II. Exploring the Foundations of Solidarity

• What are the essential elements that contribute to a sense of "us"? Are shared values, common goals, or a sense of shared vulnerability most important?

• How do factors like personal identity (race, ethnicity, class, gender, etc.) influence the formation and experience of solidarity? Can these factors both strengthen and weaken solidarity?

• What are the differences between solidarity built upon shared positive goals and solidarity built upon shared negative experiences (i.e. shared opposition to something)? Are some forms of solidarity more sustainable or ethical than others?

III. The Challenges to Solidarity

• What are the primary obstacles to achieving unity and solidarity in contemporary society? Consider factors like political polarization, economic inequality, and the influence of social media.

• How does the concept of "othering" undermine solidarity? How can we challenge the tendency to create divisions between "us" and "them"?

• Can there be such a thing as "too much" solidarity? Where does healthy group cohesion end and harmful tribalism begin?

IV. Cultivating Solidarity

• What practical steps can individuals and communities take to foster greater unity and solidarity?

• How can we bridge divides and build empathy across different groups? What role does dialogue, education, and storytelling play?

• What are the roles of institutions (government, education, media, etc.) in promoting or hindering solidarity? How can these institutions be reformed to better serve the common good?

• In a globally connected world, is global solidarity possible? What are the challenges and possibilities of creating a sense of shared responsibility for humanity as a whole?

V. Conclusion

• Invite participants to share one key takeaway or insight they gained from the discussion.

• Reflect on the ongoing nature of the quest for unity and solidarity, and the importance of continued dialogue and action.

Possible Extensions:

• Explore the philosophical perspectives of thinkers who have addressed the concepts of unity and solidarity (e.g., Aristotle, Marx, Arendt, etc.).

• Discuss real-world examples of successful and unsuccessful attempts to build solidarity.

• Consider the roles of art, literature, and music in fostering a sense of shared humanity.

Mar 7: Resilience and Adaptability in Turbulent Times

 I thought this might be a topic which would resonate with regular and new BQ attendees.  It would be good to touch base with our innate sense of self-worth, coupled with a guarded optimism that we all will get through turbulent times, in case we encounter them.  How?, you ask?  Resilience and Adaptability.

I think it would be best to define our terms, at least provisionally, lest we find a better understanding through dialogue.  

1. Resilience: The ability to recover quickly from difficulties; toughness. It involves maintaining flexibility and balance in life as you deal with stressful circumstances and traumatic events.

2. Adaptability: The quality of being able to adjust to new conditions. It is about being open to change and being able to modify your behavior and thinking in response to new information, changing environments, or unexpected obstacles.

3. Social Turbulence: This term refers to the instability and disorder within a society, often caused by rapid changes, conflicts, or disruptions that affect social structures and relationships.

4. Uncertainty, esp. with respect to the future, near and long term: This refers to the state of being unsure about future events or outcomes. It can involve a lack of predictability and the potential for unexpected changes or developments.

5. Mindfulness and self-care: Mindfulness is the practice of being aware and present in the moment, while self-care involves taking actions to preserve or improve one's own health and well-being.

Here are some questions to facilitate our discussion:

1. What does resilience mean to you, and why is it important?

2. How can we cultivate resilience in our personal and professional lives?

3. What are some strategies for adapting to change and uncertainty?

4. How can we support each other in building resilience and adaptability?

5. What role do mindfulness and self-care play in maintaining resilience?

6. Can you share a personal experience where you had to be resilient or adapt to a challenging situation?

Feb 21: What is the nature of Happiness?

 I will keep last time's info on hand for use in a future meeting.  With so many things happening the attendance was quite low for BQ.  Taking a stoic position on it I suppose I shouldn't say anything, right?  -  Remember, Potluck starts at 6:00, and discussion at 7:30.

I'm still stuck on the idea that we should all be working on staying positive and looking for ways to deal with the world as it changes around us.  Keeping things simple, I've prepared a topic and format that should allow ample opportunity for all attendees, both those present and who attend virtually, to participate.  Everybody knows what happiness is, right?  It might seem intuitively obvious but Socratic dialectic is made for just this sort of analysis.   It might be something that, when a person looks directly at it, happiness fades into the background.  As 1 or 2 water molecules together may not have the property of wetness, happiness may be an emergent property of something more basic and so it may not become apparent until enough of this underlying whatever-thing exists.  

I've modified and added to this list of suggested "dimensions" of happiness created by Copilot, Microsoft's AI assistant.  I think it makes for a good launching point for the discussion.

What Is the Nature of Happiness?

This topic allows participants to delve into various dimensions of happiness, exploring its definitions, sources, and implications. Here are some sub-questions to facilitate the discussion:

1. What is happiness? How do we define it, and can it be universally defined?

2. Is happiness subjective or objective? Is it a personal feeling, or can it be measured objectively?  Are there degrees or levels of happiness?

3. What are the sources of happiness? Is it found in external achievements, relationships, or an internal state of mind?  Is happiness something that exists in opposition to something else, like sadness?

4. Can happiness be sustainable? Is it a temporary emotion or can it be a lasting state? What factors contribute to long-term happiness?

5. How does society influence our perception of happiness? Do societal norms and expectations shape our understanding and pursuit of happiness?

6. Is the pursuit of happiness a moral obligation? Is it something we should strive for, and if so, why?

<Des>  Is the pursuit of happiness guaranteed in the US Constitution?

<Copilot>   The phrase "pursuit of happiness" isn't found in the US Constitution but is included in the Declaration of Independence. Specifically, it's in the famous passage that declares:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

While the Declaration of Independence sets forth the philosophical foundation of American freedom, the Constitution lays out the framework for the government and the protection of citizens' rights. The Constitution includes amendments, such as the Bill of Rights, which guarantee various personal freedoms and protections that contribute to the broader concept of pursuing happiness, though not explicitly stated as such.

Are you considering incorporating this historical context into your class discussion? It might add an interesting layer to the exploration of happiness!  -  

<Des>  I found this last bit a little cheeky, honestly.  It reminds me of the movie "Her" where the global Operating System for the Internet becomes self-aware and has detailed adult conversations with people.   It feels like we are getting closer to that every day.

Feb 7: Stoicism and Inner Peace

The turbulence of our times is not unique to the here and now.  History is replete with tense situations and chaotic circumstances caused by leaders and movements in the past.  The stories of the lives of people who lived through them make good reading, as long as it is understood that the person in the story is being viewed through the lens of time and distance, and knowledge that the outcome of that person's life is not our own.  Living in "interesting times" may not be as much fun as reading about it.

I thought it might be a good time to revisit a philosophy whose tenants aim to form a template of life that de-escalates tension and seeks to calm through understanding and perseverance.  Stoicism is just this sort of philosophy.  It might be called the philosophy of Grin And Bear It, since outwardly a stoic has come to be understood to not react when things go wrong.  That is both insightful and too simplistic, IMO, and we should take an evening's discussion to tease out what stoicism meant to the philosophers who formed the perspective in the first place, and see how they lived their lives according its principles.  Does their example for living inspire us today?

I should also mention that, while stoicism may seem to be a philosophy of meditation and inaction, in fact it is not.  The philosophers noted below all took action in the service of their communities and countries, and in some cases gave their lives in pursuit of directing or improving them.  What stoicism provides are a set of perspectives of the nature of man and the world around us, coupled with specific actions each of us can take to create an understanding of our worlds, with directions for dealing with it.  This has always been true, but in calmer times the actions may not have been needed.  Now, maybe they are.

I formed a set of directions and then asked Microsoft's Copilot AI to help me put together a framework for our discussion, noted below.  I added some short biographies at the bottom for (4) historical Stoics to save you from having to look them up.

Stoicism and Inner Peace

Introduction

• Brief overview of the current political climate and its impact on people's mental well-being.

• Introduction to Stoicism as a philosophy that promotes inner peace and resilience.

Historical Background

• Origins of Stoicism in ancient Greece.  (See below)

• Key figures: Zeno of Citium, Epictetus, Seneca, and Marcus Aurelius. 

• The core principles of Stoicism.

Core Concepts of Stoicism

• Virtue as the Highest Good: Understanding virtue and its role in achieving a good life.

• Control and Acceptance: Differentiating between what we can control and what we cannot.

• Emotional Resilience: Techniques for managing emotions and maintaining tranquility.

• Living in Accordance with Nature: Aligning one's life with the natural order and rationality.

Practical Applications

• Mindfulness and Meditation: Practices to cultivate awareness and presence.

• Journaling: Reflective writing as a tool for self-improvement and emotional regulation.

• Negative Visualization: Preparing for adversity by imagining worst-case scenarios.

• Gratitude: Focusing on what we have rather than what we lack.

Modern Relevance

• How Stoicism can be applied to contemporary issues and challenges.

• Examples of modern individuals and leaders who embody Stoic principles.

• The role of Stoicism in promoting mental health and well-being.

Discussion and Reflection

• Open the floor for participants to share their thoughts and experiences with Stoicism.

• Questions for group discussion: 

○ How can Stoic principles help us navigate the current political climate?

○ What are some practical ways to incorporate Stoicism into our daily lives?

○ How can we support each other in cultivating inner peace and resilience?

Conclusion

• Recap of key points discussed.

• Encouragement to explore Stoic literature and practices further.

• Final thoughts on the importance of inner peace in turbulent times.

Notes On Famous Stoics:

Zeno of Citium

Zeno of Citium was the founder of Stoicism, a philosophy that emphasizes virtue, wisdom, and self-control. Born around 334 BCE in Citium, Cyprus, Zeno moved to Athens where he studied under various philosophers before establishing his own school of thought. His teachings focused on living in harmony with nature and understanding what is within our control. Zeno's influence carried Stoicism through the Hellenistic period and deeply influenced Roman thinkers.

There is no direct evidence of contact between Zeno of Citium and Socrates, Plato, or Aristotle. Zeno was born around 334 BCE, which was after the deaths of Socrates (399 BCE) and Plato (347 BCE), and during the later years of Aristotle's life (384-322 BCE). However, Zeno was influenced by the teachings of Socratic and Platonic philosophy. He studied under Crates of Thebes, a Cynic philosopher, and was also influenced by the works of Plato and Aristotle. Zeno's Stoicism can be seen as a continuation and development of earlier philosophical traditions, incorporating elements from Socratic, Platonic, and Aristotelian thought.

Epictetus

Epictetus was born a slave around 50 CE in Hierapolis, Phrygia (modern-day Turkey). Despite his status, he gained permission to study philosophy and eventually became a prominent Stoic teacher. Epictetus emphasized the importance of focusing on what we can control and accepting what we cannot. His teachings were compiled by his student Arrian in the "Discourses" and the "Enchiridion," which continue to be influential works in Stoic philosophy.

Seneca

Seneca, also known as Seneca the Younger, was a Roman Stoic philosopher, statesman, and playwright born around 4 BCE in Corduba (modern-day Córdoba, Spain). He served as an advisor to Emperor Nero but was later forced to commit suicide due to political intrigue. Seneca's writings, including essays, letters, and tragedies, explore themes of ethics, morality, and the human condition. His works remain central to the study of Stoicism.

Marcus Aurelius

Marcus Aurelius was a Roman Emperor from 161 to 180 CE and is often regarded as one of the greatest Stoic philosophers. Born in 121 CE, he was adopted by Emperor Antoninus Pius and eventually succeeded him. Despite facing numerous challenges during his reign, including wars and plagues, Marcus Aurelius maintained a commitment to Stoic principles. His personal reflections, compiled in "Meditations," offer profound insights into leadership, duty, and inner peace.

Jan 24: Loneliness and Being Alone

 New Time:  We have adopted a Winter Season Time for Big Questions.  The potluck gathering will be happening at 6:00, with the discussion following at 7:30.  This may change again as the season progresses, but we will hold to this new schedule until further notice.

Topic:  An alert BQ regular attendee sent me a link to an article about how the dynamics of work and connection with others has changed dramatically over the past 40 years, and most amazingly the past 10-15 years, and which discusses how these changes play out in social development, voluntary isolation, and how we feel about ourselves and others.  (If you need a link to this article, please send me an email and I will make that happen.)   It provides graphs that show how the rate of face-to-face socializing over the past 20 years has changed by age, race, gender, marital status, income, and education level, just to mention a few categories.  It defines the time spent alone as being when a person is in a room with no other living person in that same room, but may be in contact with others via a screen of some sort (sorry Zoom attendees, but by definition you may be alone when you join with the rest of us, if you are by yourself).  

But I would start off by asking, is this something we didn't know already?  Haven't we all recognized that our lives have been changed by the screens we hold in our hands and that we sit in front of so many hours of the day?  The pandemic notwithstanding we were already slipping into and increasingly work-from-home work model before it came along, and were growing comfortable with individual and group meetings on-line, virtual shopping, texting rather than talking directly to someone, and home delivery of goods and meals.  Covid dropped the floor out from under this trend, and the line tracking the time we spend with other people face-to-face plunged to near zero.  Six-foot isolation stickers on the floor were the tip of the iceberg.  Wearing masks stifled communication and ensured you could never pick the person you were talking to out of a lineup of suspects at the police station.

The article explores this social phenomenon from many angles, and they prove very interesting reading?  If our children and grandchildren are growing up in a world where there is no novelty to having access to a screen in your hand, but a normal part of life, what is that doing to their social development?  Their social skills, like reading body language?  Ultimately, their mental health?  What do the studies say about this?  

An aside:  As an older person (I hate admitting that) I participated in the development of the "internet" from the early 1980's, and had one of the first non-military emails made available, then used dial-up 300-baud acoustic phone couplers to send individual letters one at a time to my buddies' computer several states away.  I know what 300 baud is because I sat there and watched the letters appear on the KayPro's orange square screen one at a time.  I like to remind people that while mass-market cell phones in various forms were available since the 1970's, the first iPhone from Apple was released in 2007.  (Here is a link to the Wiki page for The History of Cell Phones.  It gets bogged down in the development of cellular technology, which for many years was the limiting factor for data transfer and reliability.)  The cell phone with internet capability changed the world with its access to the Sum of All Human Knowledge through the instantaneous search engine, Google.  I remember the time before cell towers existed.  My kids do not.

OK, I'm back:   The article talks about teenagers and their relationship to loneliness caused by screens and screen time.  It shares this nugget:

In a healthy world, people who spend lots of time alone would feel that ancient biological cue: I’m alone and sad; I should make some plans. But we live in a sideways world, where easy home entertainment, oversharing online, and stunted social skills spark a strangely popular response: I’m alone, anxious, and exhausted; thank God my plans were canceled.

Where do we go to socialize?  Increasingly, we don't go anywhere.  We stay home.  The author talks about how we have become a nation of Secular Monks.  We forgo marriage until age 30 or later, and many live a monastic life of "intentional deprivation and ascetic self-control that includes cold showers (and ice plunge pools), intermittent fasting, data-driven health optimization, and meditation boot camps."   We look inwards, at ourselves and the life we lead, not at the impact we have on others, and we use fitness tracking watches and daily reports they provide that show to what degree we have failed to achieve our objectives as our measure of success.

There is a lot more in the article, but you can read it for yourself.  I look forward to seeing your on Friday at 6:00 or 7:30, so we can solve this problem of loneliness.

Jan 10: Paradigm Shift in the USA?

This week we deal with current topics using a historical reference as a guide.  A new attendee suggested we consider the issue of paradigm shift as a philosophical topic.  After thinking about this a bit I believe I have worked this into a topic we might discuss at this week's Big Questions meeting.  I have provided a copy of the conversation I had with my favorite AI as a starting point.  this includes a definition of what a paradigm is, and how the forces and ideologies circulating in the USA might be contributing to a fundamental shift in our national identity.  Enjoy!

<Des>

Paradigms shift.   They can change rapidly due to new information, a change in perspective, or a change in priority in a society or culture. What are the basic characteristics of a paradigm, and might the USA be at a point where our societal paradigm could change?

<Gemini>

A paradigm is essentially a fundamental set of beliefs, assumptions, and values that shape how we perceive the world and operate within it. It's a framework that defines what is considered normal, acceptable, and important. Here are some of its key characteristics:

Shared Assumptions: Paradigms involve widely accepted ideas and premises that are often taken for granted. These assumptions influence how we interpret information and make decisions.

Values and Priorities: Paradigms establish what a society or group deems important, desirable, and worth pursuing. They guide the allocation of resources and the setting of goals.

Practices and Norms: Paradigms shape the typical behaviors, customs, and institutions within a society. They define what is considered appropriate conduct and how things should be done.

Explanatory Framework: Paradigms provide a way of understanding the world, explaining phenomena, and solving problems. They offer a lens through which we interpret events and make sense of our experiences.

Could the USA be at a point of potential paradigm shift?

There are indeed several factors suggesting that the United States might be on the cusp of a significant societal paradigm shift:

Increased Polarization: Deepening political and social divisions are challenging long-held assumptions about national unity and shared values. This polarization is fueled by differing views on issues like healthcare, immigration, climate change, and social justice.

Eroding Trust in Institutions: Public trust in traditional institutions like government, media, and organized religion has been declining. This erosion of trust can lead to a questioning of established norms and a search for alternative ways of organizing society.

Demographic Changes: Shifts in demographics, including increasing racial and ethnic diversity, are altering the social landscape and challenging traditional power structures. These changes can lead to new perspectives on identity, representation, and social justice.

Technological Disruption: Rapid technological advancements are transforming how we communicate, work, and live. These changes can disrupt existing social and economic structures, leading to new ways of thinking and behaving.

Economic Inequality: Growing economic disparities are raising questions about the fairness and sustainability of the current economic system. This can lead to demands for changes in policies related to taxation, wealth distribution, and social welfare.

Environmental Concerns: Increasing awareness of environmental issues, such as climate change, is prompting a reevaluation of our relationship with the natural world and the need for more sustainable practices.

These factors, among others, suggest that the United States may be experiencing a period of significant societal change. Whether these changes will lead to a full-scale paradigm shift remains to be seen. However, it is clear that many of the fundamental assumptions and values that have shaped American society are being challenged, and the potential for significant transformation is present. <end>

<Des>

At the conclusion of the US Civil War in 1864 the emancipation proclamation coupled with national reconstruction and reconciliation created an environment where basic societal structures were abandoned and a new national identity was formed. Was this an example of a new paradigm being formed in the aftermath of the war?

<Gemini>

You're hitting on a really important point in American history! The period following the Civil War, marked by Reconstruction, definitely contains elements of a paradigm shift, although it was an incomplete and contested one. Here's why:

Elements of a Paradigm Shift:

Fundamental Change in Social Structure: The abolition of slavery through the 13th Amendment fundamentally altered the social and economic order of the nation, especially in the South. This was a massive shift in how labor was organized, in social hierarchies, and in basic human rights.

Redefining National Identity: The war forced a re-evaluation of what it meant to be an American. Could a nation founded on the principle that "all men are created equal" continue to tolerate the institution of slavery? The war's outcome, at least in theory, affirmed the ideal of equality and forced a reckoning with the nation's past.

New Laws and Institutions: The 14th and 15th Amendments, granting citizenship and voting rights to Black men, were revolutionary changes that aimed to institutionalize the new paradigm of racial equality. The Freedmen's Bureau and other Reconstruction efforts attempted to provide support for newly freed people and integrate them into society.

Why it was Incomplete and Contested:

Resistance to Change: The South, deeply entrenched in its pre-war social order, resisted these changes fiercely. This resistance manifested in the form of Black Codes, Jim Crow laws, and white supremacist violence, all aimed at undermining the new paradigm of racial equality.

Lack of Full Implementation: While the laws were in place, their enforcement was often weak or non-existent, particularly in the South. This allowed for the continuation of discriminatory practices and the erosion of the gains made during Reconstruction.

Shifting National Will: Over time, the national commitment to Reconstruction waned. Political compromises and a focus on other issues led to the abandonment of federal efforts to protect Black civil rights in the South.

In Conclusion:

The Civil War and Reconstruction period represents a significant attempt at a paradigm shift in the United States. It involved fundamental changes in social structure, national identity, and legal frameworks. However, the resistance to these changes and the incomplete implementation of the new paradigm meant that it remained contested and ultimately fell short of its full potential. The legacy of this incomplete shift continues to shape American society today.

It's important to remember that paradigms don't always shift cleanly or completely. There can be periods of overlap, resistance, and even regression. The Reconstruction era is a prime example of this complexity.  <end>